I’m a huge fan of minimalism, but these just looks sadder, less informative, and less creative as you scroll. “Stunning” is not a word I would choose.
Tony
starting to feel like the blogging is something we old folk did so way back and when. and the internets? what might that be? and the comment thread? unknown. and the talking few? FEW! : )
Try “The Cheese Monkeys” by Chip Kidd.
It’s a hoot and a half, and also why I chose this major.
Tony
Why you chose the major? What part of the story convinced you?
Lila B
Apparently you cannot reply to tertiary comments here.
Anyway, the title, wonky graphic gimmicks, and adorable manner of writing pulled me in, then I found myself thoroughly engaged in the actual lessons being taught by Sorbeck. It made me aware of things that had hardly crossed my conscious mind, despite how many times they had passed through my field of vision.
I never planned to be an art major: I excelled at math and science, and assumed I’d do something in that field. I was told that I was good at art and had enjoyed doing it, but I didn’t understand why someone would dedicate their life to such a thing. I couldn’t (still can’t) find a personal reason for me to JUST (yeah, I said it) make things. I require finite, logical reason for my motivation to exist. In “The Cheese Monkeys,” I discovered that there was an area of art that actually had specific purpose, and was infatuated with the combination of mathematical precision and specificity with the inconsistent, inexplicable nature of aesthetics. I guess I had heard of graphic design, but I didn’t really know what it entailed until I read the book.
Oh also, that chapter where they’re all working on their final projects in complete delirium: that was just so perfectly expressed, it really just sealed my fate. I mean, there were a few sentences where he was talking aboot looking at his pen and being confused by the ink colour…just…yes.
Caitlin L
ON CREATIVITY:
“All who study creativity agree that for something to be creative, it is not enough for it to be novel: it must have value, or be appropriate to the cognitive demands of the situation.” From Creativity – Beyond the Myth of Genius, by Robert W. Weisberg.
Tony
And there are far too many overlooked situations—potentials abound.
Darya K.
Anyone interested in meeting up in the studio and working together sometime? I think it may help us progress faster and it would be interesting just to bounce ideas off each other :)
Tony
A strong studio culture and collaborative working environsment is worth twice the education. Fact.
“Only through disengagement can you gain the space—the proper perspective—to truly intervene. If you directly intervene, you never act in empty space.” — Slavoj Žižek
Whellp. Since the class has moved fully into the realm of motion design, I’d like to share my favourite “artistic” short. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOID2_-qt4c
Unfortunately, I cannot find it in better quality, as the campaign is long outdated and MAC has long since taken down the original.
Oooh, I nearly forgot: also this http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-kDlLCc2NyM
agreed
Hooray, let’s get FLAT.
I’m a huge fan of minimalism, but these just looks sadder, less informative, and less creative as you scroll. “Stunning” is not a word I would choose.
starting to feel like the blogging is something we old folk did so way back and when. and the internets? what might that be? and the comment thread? unknown. and the talking few? FEW! : )
Flat and SILENT! SuperFlat and the Few!
Few few few.
Though maybe Nestlé should deserve unappealing design.
…Was that a smiley?
Speaking of animated type…
The top comments make me sad though.
I would like to get a list of good design books to look into. Suggestions?
A good place to browse:DESIGNERS AND BOOKS
Try “The Cheese Monkeys” by Chip Kidd.
It’s a hoot and a half, and also why I chose this major.
Why you chose the major? What part of the story convinced you?
Apparently you cannot reply to tertiary comments here.
Anyway, the title, wonky graphic gimmicks, and adorable manner of writing pulled me in, then I found myself thoroughly engaged in the actual lessons being taught by Sorbeck. It made me aware of things that had hardly crossed my conscious mind, despite how many times they had passed through my field of vision.
I never planned to be an art major: I excelled at math and science, and assumed I’d do something in that field. I was told that I was good at art and had enjoyed doing it, but I didn’t understand why someone would dedicate their life to such a thing. I couldn’t (still can’t) find a personal reason for me to JUST (yeah, I said it) make things. I require finite, logical reason for my motivation to exist. In “The Cheese Monkeys,” I discovered that there was an area of art that actually had specific purpose, and was infatuated with the combination of mathematical precision and specificity with the inconsistent, inexplicable nature of aesthetics. I guess I had heard of graphic design, but I didn’t really know what it entailed until I read the book.
Oh also, that chapter where they’re all working on their final projects in complete delirium: that was just so perfectly expressed, it really just sealed my fate. I mean, there were a few sentences where he was talking aboot looking at his pen and being confused by the ink colour…just…yes.
ON CREATIVITY:
“All who study creativity agree that for something to be creative, it is not enough for it to be novel: it must have value, or be appropriate to the cognitive demands of the situation.” From Creativity – Beyond the Myth of Genius, by Robert W. Weisberg.
And there are far too many overlooked situations—potentials abound.
Anyone interested in meeting up in the studio and working together sometime? I think it may help us progress faster and it would be interesting just to bounce ideas off each other :)
A strong studio culture and collaborative working environsment is worth twice the education. Fact.